​MEI World Rankings
The MEI framework is designed to incorporate not only social dimensions but also rigorous performance metrics that capture academic merit, operational excellence, and tangible societal impact. By integrating quantitative data with qualitative insights, the new ranking system offers a transparent, objective, and globally relevant methodology. The MEI World Rankings manual-handbook provides an in-depth guide to understanding the rationale behind the shift, the underlying principles, methodologies, implementation practices, and future directions of the rankings. We invite institutions, policy makers, and global stakeholders to explore, adopt, and refine this framework as we collectively strive for excellence in institutional performance and sustainable development.
Weightage & Metrics for MEI Rankings
To ensure a justifiable balance between qualitative and quantitative evaluation, the MEI Rankings 2025 will assess institutions across three core pillars—Merit, Excellence, and Impact—using a dual approach that incorporates both survey responses and hard performance data. This framework is designed to be robust and adaptable, reflecting the nuances of both the Indian and global education contexts.
​
-
Merit (35%): 70% quantitative (academic outputs, faculty credentials, student performance) and 30% qualitative (curriculum and reputation).
-
Excellence (35%): 60% quantitative (operational data, technology, outcomes) and 40% qualitative (innovation practices, stakeholder feedback).
-
Impact (30%): Equally balanced between quantitative (alumni outcomes, community engagement, sustainability) and qualitative metrics (social contribution, long-term impact).
This balanced approach, blending hard data with nuanced qualitative insights, ensures that the MEI Rankings provide a comprehensive, globally relevant assessment of institutional performance, aligning with both contemporary global trends and the unique dynamics of the Indian education landscape.​​
MEI for Strong Institutions
Recent global trends indicate that while Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives were an important starting point, they sometimes fall short in capturing the full spectrum of what universities need today. Several factors drive the rationale for moving beyond DEI, for instance:
​
-
Subjectivity: DEI metrics can be influenced by local cultural norms and political perspectives
-
Limited Scope: Focusing only on diversity may neglect other crucial performance areas.
-
Inconsistent Data: Reliance on self-reported and qualitative data reduces comparability.
-
HR Trends: American and global MNC HR policies increasingly favor performance-based metrics over process-oriented DEI scores.​​
The new ranking system aims to provide a balanced evaluation that incorporates merit (academic credentials, research quality), excellence (innovation, operational effectiveness), and impact (societal, economic, and environmental contributions). This holistic view better captures the overall strength of an institution. The prime advantages of shifting to "MEI Rankings" are:
​
-
Holistic Evaluation: Captures academic merit, operational excellence, and tangible impact.
-
Objectivity: Uses quantifiable, standardized metrics that enhance transparency.
-
Stakeholder Alignment: Meets the expectations of global companies and policy makers for demonstrable results.
-
Sustainable Impact: Encourages continuous improvement and accountability aligned with global standards (e.g., SDG-16).
​​